LOU O' BEDLAM

The blog of Lou Noble.

Photos & I = BFF

All this here is what I'm looking at, listening to, photographing, eating, doing, thinking (kinda), hating on, in love with, stalking, coveting, rocking out to.


Photography is Love.

Love is God.

Photography is God.


Fund my photographic endeavors:


Ask Me Questions!!!!

Email me: louobedlam@gmail.com

My website: LOUOBEDLAM.COM



Where I write a lot, in teeny tiny bits:
twitter

Where most of my photos are:
flickr

Where you can look at all the photos on this blog:
gallery

Burger Day: (where I try to find the best burger in LA, and write about it!!!!): MMmmmmm

Where I play chess:
gameKnot



Sites I Like:
Laura Taylor
Julia Galdo
The Last Days of Polaroid
Awkwardly Social
Grant Morrison

Big Question of the Week

As it’s the 20th anniversary of Photoshop, I’m wondering:

Is photography better off for its creation?

I know it’s made a lot of things more convenient, easier, faster.  But has it actually fostered creativity? Moved the medium forward?

I ask sincerely, not as a way of denigrating the program, but because I’m really not sure.  The fact that it exists has made things easier for me, definitely.  Even though I don’t use that particular program, I use programs related to it (iPhoto) for management, adjustments.  I’ve been wondering this for a few days, now. Figure this is the best way to put the thought to rest.

Is it a necessary thing, hand in hand with digital photography in general?

Has it made photos better? More importantly (for me): Has it made photographers better?

Comments (View)
blog comments powered by Disqus